↓ Skip to main content

Carvedilol versus traditional, non-selective beta-blockers for adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carvedilol versus traditional, non-selective beta-blockers for adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011510.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antony P Zacharias, Rebecca Jeyaraj, Lise Hobolth, Flemming Bendtsen, Lise Lotte Gluud, Marsha Y Morgan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 20%
Student > Master 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Unspecified 4 27%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Computer Science 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 3 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,769,668
of 13,639,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,678
of 10,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,446
of 308,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,639,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.