↓ Skip to main content

Synergistic chondroprotective effects of curcumin and resveratrol in human articular chondrocytes: inhibition of IL-1β-induced NF-κB-mediated inflammation and apoptosis

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synergistic chondroprotective effects of curcumin and resveratrol in human articular chondrocytes: inhibition of IL-1β-induced NF-κB-mediated inflammation and apoptosis
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/ar2850
Pubmed ID
Authors

Constanze Csaki, Ali Mobasheri, Mehdi Shakibaei

Abstract

Currently available treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) are restricted to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which exhibit numerous side effects and are only temporarily effective. Thus novel, safe and more efficacious anti-inflammatory agents are needed for OA. Naturally occurring polyphenolic compounds, such as curcumin and resveratrol, are potent agents for modulating inflammation. Both compounds mediate their effects by targeting the NF-kappaB signalling pathway.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 106 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 15 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2017.
All research outputs
#926,190
of 13,947,635 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#176
of 2,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,134
of 211,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#7
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,947,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.