You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Acute and Chronic Pulmonary Emboli: Angiography–CT Correlation
American Journal of Roentgenology, June 2006
Conrad Wittram, Mannudeep K. Kalra, Michael M. Maher, Alan Greenfield, Theresa C. McLoud, Jo-Anne O. Shepard
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Postgraduate||12||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||11||11%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||9||9%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||8||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||72||75%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||2||2%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||1||1%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2018.
All research outputs
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Roentgenology
of 7,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 65,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Roentgenology
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.