↓ Skip to main content

Non-pharmacological therapies for dysphagia in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-pharmacological therapies for dysphagia in Parkinson's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002816
Authors

Katherine Deane, Renata Whurr, Carl E Clarke, E Diane Playford, Yoav Ben-Shlomo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 28%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Neuroscience 9 10%
Psychology 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 8 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,605,303
of 13,715,693 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,028
of 10,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,254
of 308,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,715,693 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.