↓ Skip to main content

A comprehensive evaluation of rodent malaria parasite genomes and gene expression

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comprehensive evaluation of rodent malaria parasite genomes and gene expression
Published in
BMC Biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12915-014-0086-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas D Otto, Ulrike Böhme, Andrew P Jackson, Martin Hunt, Blandine Franke-Fayard, Wieteke A M Hoeijmakers, Agnieszka A Religa, Lauren Robertson, Mandy Sanders, Solabomi A Ogun, Deirdre Cunningham, Annette Erhart, Oliver Billker, Shahid M Khan, Hendrik G Stunnenberg, Jean Langhorne, Anthony A Holder, Andrew P Waters, Chris I Newbold, Arnab Pain, Matthew Berriman, Chris J Janse

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 213 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 26%
Student > Master 44 20%
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 24 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,657,102
of 7,054,473 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#489
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,096
of 318,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,054,473 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.