↓ Skip to main content

Mineralogy of Uranium and Thorium (R.J. Lauf)

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Geology (geoscienceworld.org), September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mineralogy of Uranium and Thorium (R.J. Lauf)
Published in
Economic Geology (geoscienceworld.org), September 2018
DOI 10.5382/econgeo.113.6.br02
Authors

Cliff D. Taylor

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Researcher 3 33%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 44%
Chemistry 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2018.
All research outputs
#12,139,505
of 13,698,878 outputs
Outputs from Economic Geology (geoscienceworld.org)
#309
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,307
of 308,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Geology (geoscienceworld.org)
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,698,878 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.