You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effective interventions for breast cancer, cervical cancer, and colorectal cancer: new results from WHO-CHOICE
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-018-0157-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ambinintsoa H. Ralaidovy, Chaitra Gopalappa, André Ilbawi, Carel Pretorius, Jeremy A. Lauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 56 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,092,220
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#70
of 430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,205
of 350,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.