↓ Skip to main content

Functional and geographic components of risk for climate sensitive vertebrates in the Pacific Northwest, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Functional and geographic components of risk for climate sensitive vertebrates in the Pacific Northwest, USA
Published in
Biological Conservation, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.012
Authors

Meryl C. Mims, Deanna H. Olson, David S. Pilliod, Jason B. Dunham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 50%
Environmental Science 7 18%
Psychology 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#902,262
of 14,378,051 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#808
of 4,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,679
of 318,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#34
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,378,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.