↓ Skip to main content

Treatment outcomes in a safety observational study of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine (Eurartesim®) in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria at public health facilities in four African countries

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment outcomes in a safety observational study of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine (Eurartesim®) in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria at public health facilities in four African countries
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1099-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Adjei, Solomon Narh-Bana, Alberta Amu, Vida Kukula, Richard Afedi Nagai, Seth Owusu-Agyei, Abraham Oduro, Eusebio Macete, Salim Abdulla, Tinto Halidou, Ali Sie, Isaac Osei, Esperance Sevene, Kwaku-Poku Asante, Abdunoor Mulokozi, Guillaume Compaore, Innocent Valea, Martin Adjuik, Rita Baiden, Bernhards Ogutu, Fred Binka, Margaret Gyapong

Abstract

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PQ) is one of five WHO recommended artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. However, little was known on its post-registration safety and effectiveness in sub-Saharan Africa. DHA-PQ provides a long post-treatment prophylactic effect against re-infection; however, new infections have been reported within a few weeks of treatment, especially in children. This paper reports the clinical outcomes following administration of DHQ-PQ in real-life conditions in public health facilities in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mozambique, and Tanzania for the treatment of confirmed uncomplicated malaria. An observational, non-comparative, longitudinal study was conducted on 10,591 patients with confirmed uncomplicated malaria visiting public health facilities within seven health and demographic surveillance system sites in four African countries (Ghana, Tanzania, Burkina Faso, Mozambique) between September 2013 and April 2014. Patients were treated with DHA-PQ based on body weight and followed up for 28 days to assess the clinical outcome. A nested cohort of 1002 was intensely followed up. Clinical outcome was assessed using the proportion of patients who reported signs and symptoms of malaria after completing 3 days of treatment. A total of 11,097 patients were screened with 11,017 enrolled, 94 were lost to follow-up, 332 withdrew and 10,591 (96.1 %) patients aged 6 months-85 years met protocol requirements for analysis. Females were 52.8 and 48.5 % were <5 years of age. Malaria was diagnosed by microscopy and rapid diagnostic test in 69.8 % and 29.9 %, respectively. At day 28, the unadjusted risk of recurrent symptomatic parasitaemia was 0.5 % (51/10,591). Most of the recurrent symptomatic malaria patients (76 %) were children <5 years. The mean haemoglobin level decreased from 10.6 g/dl on day 1 to 10.2 g/dl on day 7. There was no significant renal impairment in the nested cohort during the first 7 days of follow-up with minimal non-clinically significant changes noted in the liver enzymes. DHA-PQ was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria and provides an excellent alternative first-line ACT in sub-Saharan Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,091,592
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,948
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,024
of 405,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#110
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.