↓ Skip to main content

Development and internal validation of the multivariable CIPHER (Collaborative Integrated Pregnancy High-dependency Estimate of Risk) clinical risk prediction model

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and internal validation of the multivariable CIPHER (Collaborative Integrated Pregnancy High-dependency Estimate of Risk) clinical risk prediction model
Published in
Critical Care, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13054-018-2215-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth A. Payne, Helen Ryan, Jeffrey Bone, Laura A. Magee, Alice B. Aarvold, J. Mark Ansermino, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, Mary Bowen, J. Guilherme Cecatti, Cynthia Chazotte, Tim Crozier, Anne-Cornélie J. M. de Pont, Oktay Demirkiran, Tao Duan, Marlot Kallen, Wessel Ganzevoort, Michael Geary, Dena Goffman, Jennifer A. Hutcheon, K. S. Joseph, Stephen E. Lapinsky, Isam Lataifeh, Jing Li, Sarka Liskonova, Emily M. Hamel, Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, Colm O’Herlihy, Ben W. J. Mol, P. Gareth R. Seaward, Ramzy Tadros, Turkan Togal, Rahat Qureshi, U. Vivian Ukah, Daniela Vasquez, Euan Wallace, Paul Yong, Vivian Zhou, Keith R. Walley, Peter von Dadelszen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,560,270
of 14,173,688 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,444
of 4,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,461
of 317,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#248
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,173,688 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.