You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Galaxy Portal: interacting with the galaxy platform through mobile devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bioinformatics, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claus Børnich, Ivar Grytten, Eivind Hovig, Jonas Paulsen, Martin Čech, Geir Kjetil Sandve |
| Abstract |
We present Galaxy Portal app, an open source interface to the Galaxy system through smartphones and tablets. The Galaxy Portal provides convenient and efficient monitoring of job completion, as well as opportunities for inspection of results and execution history. In addition to being useful to the Galaxy community, we believe that the app also exemplifies a useful way of exploiting mobile interfaces for research/high-performance computing resources in general. The source is freely available under a GPL license on GitHub, along with user documentation and pre-compiled binaries and instructions for several platforms: https://github.com/Tarostar/QMLGalaxyPortal. It is available for iOS version 7 (and newer) through the Apple App Store, and for Android through Google Play for version 4.1 (API 16) or newer. [email protected]. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 80% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,293,845
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#5,120
of 12,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,158
of 406,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#120
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.