You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabien B. Wagner, Jean-Baptiste Mignardot, Camille G. Le Goff-Mignardot, Robin Demesmaeker, Salif Komi, Marco Capogrosso, Andreas Rowald, Ismael Seáñez, Miroslav Caban, Elvira Pirondini, Molywan Vat, Laura A. McCracken, Roman Heimgartner, Isabelle Fodor, Anne Watrin, Perrine Seguin, Edoardo Paoles, Katrien Van Den Keybus, Grégoire Eberle, Brigitte Schurch, Etienne Pralong, Fabio Becce, John Prior, Nicholas Buse, Rik Buschman, Esra Neufeld, Niels Kuster, Stefano Carda, Joachim von Zitzewitz, Vincent Delattre, Tim Denison, Hendrik Lambert, Karen Minassian, Jocelyne Bloch, Grégoire Courtine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,417 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 263 | 19% |
| Japan | 99 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 70 | 5% |
| Canada | 44 | 3% |
| Spain | 42 | 3% |
| France | 34 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 32 | 2% |
| India | 21 | 1% |
| Germany | 19 | 1% |
| Other | 175 | 12% |
| Unknown | 618 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 989 | 70% |
| Scientists | 347 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 54 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 27 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 193 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 186 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 131 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 119 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 61 | 5% |
| Other | 152 | 13% |
| Unknown | 296 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 222 | 20% |
| Engineering | 212 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 3% |
| Other | 135 | 12% |
| Unknown | 373 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1919. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,063
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#541
of 98,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80
of 364,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#15
of 1,162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.