You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A dynamic leaf gas‐exchange strategy is conserved in woody plants under changing ambient CO2: evidence from carbon isotope discrimination in paleo and CO2 enrichment studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.13102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven L Voelker, J Renée Brooks, Frederick C Meinzer, Rebecca Anderson, Martin K-F Bader, Giovanna Battipaglia, Katie M Becklin, David Beerling, Didier Bert, Julio L Betancourt, Todd E Dawson, Jean-Christophe Domec, Richard P Guyette, Christian Körner, Steven W Leavitt, Sune Linder, John D Marshall, Manuel Mildner, Jérôme Ogée, Irina Panyushkina, Heather J Plumpton, Kurt S Pregitzer, Matthias Saurer, Andrew R Smith, Rolf T W Siegwolf, Michael C Stambaugh, Alan F Talhelm, Jacques C Tardif, Peter K Van de Water, Joy K Ward, Lisa Wingate |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 22% |
| Researcher | 37 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 22 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#6,288
of 6,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,620
of 405,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#82
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.