You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-016-2747-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erika Langham, Hannah Thorne, Matthew Browne, Phillip Donaldson, Judy Rose, Matthew Rockloff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 5 | 38% |
United States | 2 | 15% |
Finland | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 273 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 35 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 12% |
Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 4% |
Other | 42 | 15% |
Unknown | 105 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 48 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 36 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
Other | 24 | 9% |
Unknown | 114 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,603,930
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,838
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,705
of 409,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#28
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.