↓ Skip to main content

Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-2747-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erika Langham, Hannah Thorne, Matthew Browne, Phillip Donaldson, Judy Rose, Matthew Rockloff

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 273 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Other 10 4%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 105 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 18%
Social Sciences 36 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 114 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,603,930
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,838
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,705
of 409,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#28
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.