You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patients With Cancer and Social Media: Harness Benefits, Avoid Drawbacks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Oncology Practice, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jop.18.00367 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle Gentile, Merry Jennifer Markham, Tara Eaton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 49% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Sudan | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Croatia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 54% |
| Scientists | 14 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 23% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#370,823
of 24,059,832 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oncology Practice
#36
of 1,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,626
of 444,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oncology Practice
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,059,832 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.