↓ Skip to main content

Lens extraction for chronic angle-closure glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lens extraction for chronic angle-closure glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005555.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Friedman, Satyanarayana S Vedula

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 19%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 14 33%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 4 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,724,592
of 14,414,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,627
of 10,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,745
of 339,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,414,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.