↓ Skip to main content

Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
40 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012701.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver J Schofield-Robinson, Sharon R Lewis, Andrew F Smith, Joanne McPeake, Phil Alderson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 41 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 25%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 39 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#617,560
of 14,330,160 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,830
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,381
of 316,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,330,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.