↓ Skip to main content

Measures assessing attributes of evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) competence among nurses: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measures assessing attributes of evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) competence among nurses: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0849-8
Authors

Emily Belita, Jennifer Yost, Janet E. Squires, Rebecca Ganann, Trish Burnett, Maureen Dobbins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 17%
Engineering 5 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 15 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,278,366
of 14,010,124 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#279
of 1,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,735
of 315,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#53
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,010,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.