↓ Skip to main content

Health information systems and pesticide poisoning at Pernambuco

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 191)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health information systems and pesticide poisoning at Pernambuco
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, September 2015
DOI 10.1590/1980-5497201500030012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Costa Cavalcanti de Albuquerque, Idê Gomes Dantas Gurgel, Aline do Monte Gurgel, Lia Giraldo da Silva Augusto, Marília Teixeira de Siqueira

Abstract

Understanding the epidemiologic profile of a particular disease is key to undertake health actions. To that end, information systems that present quality data help in the decision-making process and demonstrate the impact of the problems. To analyze the contribution of health information systems for the characterization of pesticide poisoning through SINAN, CEATOX and SIM in the State of Pernambuco. In this study, the completeness and consistency of the data were assessed, as well as the epidemiological profile of pesticide poisoning in Pernambuco in the period from 2008 to 2012, based on the following Health Information Systems: Center for Toxicological Assistance of Pernambuco (CEATOX), Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN) and Mortality Information System (SIM). The data revealed incompleteness and inconsistencies in information. Regarding the profile, females are more affected in the morbidity profile, and men have a higher mortality rate. Poisoning was more frequent in young adults with low educational level. With regard to the circumstances, most of the cases were suicide attempts, unique acute cases and not related to work. Despite suggesting underreporting, the data showed that persons engaged in agriculture are most commonly affected. The strengthening of these systems is necessary for the generation of consistent information that support health policies for the population groups involved.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 23 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 24 57%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,866,748
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#19
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,483
of 349,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.