You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeted Health Behavior Interventions Promoting Physical Activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Exercise and Sport Sciences Review, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1249/jes.0000000000000075 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip J. Morgan, Myles D. Young, Jordan J. Smith, David R. Lubans |
| Abstract |
This paper presents a conceptual model illustrating a targeted approach to the design and delivery of health behavior interventions that focus on physical activity promotion. We hypothesize that researchers who i) enhance the socio-cultural relevance of their core intervention components, and ii) recognize the unique contributions of both intervention design and delivery, will experience greater intervention engagement and improved outcomes. This paper presents a conceptual model of key factors that characterize a socio-culturally targeted approach to physical activity intervention design and delivery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 17% |
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| Ireland | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 21 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 21 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 22% |
| Unknown | 36 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 40 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Psychology | 14 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,227,743
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Exercise and Sport Sciences Review
#140
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,048
of 314,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Exercise and Sport Sciences Review
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.