↓ Skip to main content

r2VIM: A new variable selection method for random forests in genome-wide association studies

Overview of attention for article published in BioData Mining, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 320)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
r2VIM: A new variable selection method for random forests in genome-wide association studies
Published in
BioData Mining, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13040-016-0087-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silke Szymczak, Emily Holzinger, Abhijit Dasgupta, James D. Malley, Anne M. Molloy, James L. Mills, Lawrence C. Brody, Dwight Stambolian, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson

Abstract

Machine learning methods and in particular random forests (RFs) are a promising alternative to standard single SNP analyses in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). RFs provide variable importance measures (VIMs) to rank SNPs according to their predictive power. However, in contrast to the established genome-wide significance threshold, no clear criteria exist to determine how many SNPs should be selected for downstream analyses. We propose a new variable selection approach, recurrent relative variable importance measure (r2VIM). Importance values are calculated relative to an observed minimal importance score for several runs of RF and only SNPs with large relative VIMs in all of the runs are selected as important. Evaluations on simulated GWAS data show that the new method controls the number of false-positives under the null hypothesis. Under a simple alternative hypothesis with several independent main effects it is only slightly less powerful than logistic regression. In an experimental GWAS data set, the same strong signal is identified while the approach selects none of the SNPs in an underpowered GWAS. The novel variable selection method r2VIM is a promising extension to standard RF for objectively selecting relevant SNPs in GWAS while controlling the number of false-positive results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 21%
Computer Science 11 14%
Engineering 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,495,525
of 24,598,501 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#49
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,670
of 407,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,598,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.