You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Naturalizing cruelty
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biology & Philosophy, July 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10539-008-9120-3 |
Authors |
G. Randolph Mayes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Russia | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 25% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philosophy | 7 | 19% |
Psychology | 6 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#707,872
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#16
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,353
of 82,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them