↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary analysis across mammals reveals distinct classes of long non-coding RNAs

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolutionary analysis across mammals reveals distinct classes of long non-coding RNAs
Published in
Genome Biology, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-0880-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny Chen, Alexander A. Shishkin, Xiaopeng Zhu, Sabah Kadri, Itay Maza, Mitchell Guttman, Jacob H. Hanna, Aviv Regev, Manuel Garber

Abstract

Recent advances in transcriptome sequencing have enabled the discovery of thousands of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) across many species. Though several lncRNAs have been shown to play important roles in diverse biological processes, the functions and mechanisms of most lncRNAs remain unknown. Two significant obstacles lie between transcriptome sequencing and functional characterization of lncRNAs: identifying truly non-coding genes from de novo reconstructed transcriptomes, and prioritizing the hundreds of resulting putative lncRNAs for downstream experimental interrogation. We present slncky, a lncRNA discovery tool that produces a high-quality set of lncRNAs from RNA-sequencing data and further uses evolutionary constraint to prioritize lncRNAs that are likely to be functionally important. Our automated filtering pipeline is comparable to manual curation efforts and more sensitive than previously published computational approaches. Furthermore, we developed a sensitive alignment pipeline for aligning lncRNA loci and propose new evolutionary metrics relevant for analyzing sequence and transcript evolution. Our analysis reveals that evolutionary selection acts in several distinct patterns, and uncovers two notable classes of intergenic lncRNAs: one showing strong purifying selection on RNA sequence and another where constraint is restricted to the regulation but not the sequence of the transcript. Our results highlight that lncRNAs are not a homogenous class of molecules but rather a mixture of multiple functional classes with distinct biological mechanism and/or roles. Our novel comparative methods for lncRNAs reveals 233 constrained lncRNAs out of tens of thousands of currently annotated transcripts, which we make available through the slncky Evolution Browser.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 295 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 26%
Researcher 66 21%
Student > Master 41 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Professor 18 6%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 39 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 120 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 30%
Computer Science 16 5%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 50 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,431,904
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,139
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,205
of 405,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#21
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.