↓ Skip to main content

Incidence and endoscopic characteristics of acute laryngeal lesions in children undergoing endotracheal intubation

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incidence and endoscopic characteristics of acute laryngeal lesions in children undergoing endotracheal intubation
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.09.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eliandra da Silveira de Lima, Maíra Alves Braga de Oliveira, Carolina Rocha Barone, Kharina Mayara Moreira Dias, Samanta Daiana de Rossi, Claudia Schweiger, Denise Manica, Larissa Valency Enéas, Catia de Souza Saleh Netto, Gabriel Kuhl, Paulo Roberto Antonacci Carvalho, Paulo Jose Cauduro Marostica

Abstract

Acute laryngeal lesions after intubation appear to be precursors of chronic lesions. To describe the incidence and type of acute laryngeal lesions after extubation in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). A cohort study involving children from birth to <5 years, submitted to intubation for more than 24h in the PICU of an university hospital. In the first eight hours after extubation, a flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FFL) was performed at the bedside. Those with moderate to severe abnormalities underwent a second examination seven to ten days later. 177 patients were included, with a median age of 2.46 months. The mean intubation time was 8.19 days. Seventy-three (41.2%) patients had moderate or severe alterations at the FFL, with the remaining showing only minor alterations or normal results. During follow-up, 16 children from the group with moderate to severe lesions developed subglottic stenosis. One patient from the normal FFL group had subglottic stenosis, resulting in an incidence of 9.6% of chronic lesions. Most children in the study developed mild acute laryngeal lesions caused by endotracheal intubation, which improved in a few days after extubation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 45%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#501
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,248
of 400,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.