↓ Skip to main content

Macronutrients, vitamins and minerals intake and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-control study in Iran

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Macronutrients, vitamins and minerals intake and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-control study in Iran
Published in
Nutrition Journal, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-137
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahsa Jessri, Bahram Rashidkhani, Bahareh Hajizadeh, Maryam Jessri, Carolyn Gotay

Abstract

Although Iran is a high-risk region for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), dietary factors that may contribute to this high incidence have not been thoroughly studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of macronutrients, vitamins and minerals on the risk of ESCC.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 23%
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,275,683
of 15,681,050 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#794
of 1,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,300
of 220,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#72
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,681,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.