↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional aspects related to endometriosis

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 978)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
twitter
7 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
8 Facebook pages
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional aspects related to endometriosis
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, December 2015
DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.61.06.519
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriela Halpern, Eduardo Schor, Alexander Kopelman

Abstract

This literature review analyzed the evidence on nutritional aspects related to the pathogenesis and progression of endometriosis. Diets deficient in nutrients result in changes in lipid metabolism, oxidative stress and promote epigenetic abnormalities, that may be involved in the genesis and progression of the disease. Foods rich in omega 3 with anti-inflammatory effects, supplementation with Nacetylcysteine, vitamin D and resveratrol, in addition to the increased consumption of fruits, vegetables (preferably organic) and whole grains exert a protective effect, reducing the risk of development and possible regression of disease. Dietary re-education seems to be a promising tool in the prevention and treatment of endometriosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 244 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 60 24%
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Researcher 17 7%
Other 14 6%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 60 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Unspecified 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 73 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#314,806
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#3
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,663
of 387,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them