You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional, motor, and sensory assessment instruments upon nerve repair in adult hands: systematic review of psychometric properties
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0836-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marisa de Cássia Registro Fonseca, Valéria Meireles Carril Elui, Emily Lalone, Natália Claro da Silva, Rafael Inácio Barbosa, Alexandre Márcio Marcolino, Flávia Pessoni Faleiros Macedo Ricci, Joy C. MacDermid |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 57% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 37 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,044,369
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,379
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,214
of 362,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#50
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.