↓ Skip to main content

Tularemia in Alaska, 1938 - 2010

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 837)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tularemia in Alaska, 1938 - 2010
Published in
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1751-0147-53-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina M Hansen, Amy J Vogler, Paul Keim, David M Wagner, Karsten Hueffer

Abstract

Tularemia is a serious, potentially life threatening zoonotic disease. The causative agent, Francisella tularensis, is ubiquitous in the Northern hemisphere, including Alaska, where it was first isolated from a rabbit tick (Haemophysalis leporis-palustris) in 1938. Since then, F. tularensis has been isolated from wildlife and humans throughout the state. Serologic surveys have found measurable antibodies with prevalence ranging from < 1% to 50% and 4% to 18% for selected populations of wildlife species and humans, respectively. We reviewed and summarized known literature on tularemia surveillance in Alaska and summarized the epidemiological information on human cases reported to public health officials. Additionally, available F. tularensis isolates from Alaska were analyzed using canonical SNPs and a multi-locus variable-number tandem repeats (VNTR) analysis (MLVA) system. The results show that both F. t. tularensis and F. t. holarctica are present in Alaska and that subtype A.I, the most virulent type, is responsible for most recently reported human clinical cases in the state.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 36%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 47%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,274,847
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#50
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,811
of 243,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them