You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Virtual slides in peer reviewed, open access medical publication
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-1596-6-124 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Klaus Kayser, Stephan Borkenfeld, Torsten Goldmann, Gian Kayser |
Abstract |
Application of virtual slides (VS), the digitalization of complete glass slides, is in its infancy to be implemented in routine diagnostic surgical pathology and to issues that are related to tissue-based diagnosis, such as education and scientific publication. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 20% |
Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 38% |
Computer Science | 5 | 13% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2011.
All research outputs
#18,303,139
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#754
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,490
of 242,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#15
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.