↓ Skip to main content

Deep Multi-OMICs and Multi-Tissue Characterization in a Pre- and Postprandial State in Human Volunteers: The GEMM Family Study Research Design

Overview of attention for article published in Genes, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep Multi-OMICs and Multi-Tissue Characterization in a Pre- and Postprandial State in Human Volunteers: The GEMM Family Study Research Design
Published in
Genes, November 2018
DOI 10.3390/genes9110532
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raul A. Bastarrachea, Hugo A. Laviada-Molina, Edna J. Nava-Gonzalez, Irene Leal-Berumen, Claudia Escudero-Lourdes, Fabiola Escalante-Araiza, Vanessa-Giselle Peschard, Rosa A. Veloz-Garza, Karin Haack, Angélica Martínez-Hernández, Francisco M. Barajas-Olmos, Fernanda Molina-Segui, Fatima A. Buenfil-Rello, Lucia Gonzalez-Ramirez, Reinhard Janssen-Aguilar, Ricardo Lopez-Muñoz, Fernanda Perez-Cetina, Janeth F. Gaytan-Saucedo, Zoila Vaquera, Judith Cornejo-Barrera, Juan Carlos Castillo-Pineda, Areli Murillo-Ramirez, Sara P. Diaz-Tena, Benigno Figueroa-Nuñez, Laura González-López, Rocío A. Salinas-Osornio, Melesio E. Valencia-Rendón, José Ángeles-Chimal, Jesús Santa-Olalla Tapia, José M. Remes-Troche, Salvador B. Valdovinos-Chavez, Eira E. Huerta-Avila, Xianlin Han, Lorena Orozco, Ernesto Rodriguez-Ayala, Susan Weintraub, Esther C. Gallegos-Cabrales, Shelley A. Cole, Jack W. Kent

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,043,108
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Genes
#1,342
of 5,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,806
of 351,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes
#35
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,585 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.