You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Propofol vs. inhalational agents to maintain general anaesthesia in ambulatory and in-patient surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12871-018-0632-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Schraag, Lorenzo Pradelli, Abdul Jabbar Omar Alsaleh, Marco Bellone, Gianni Ghetti, Tje Lin Chung, Martin Westphal, Sebastian Rehberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 62 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 63 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,159,460
of 23,372,207 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#289
of 1,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,360
of 353,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#16
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,532 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.