↓ Skip to main content

Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
57 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008070.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate F Walker, Marion Kibuka, Jim G Thornton, Nia W Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 131 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 20%
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 24%
Unspecified 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 24 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#481,689
of 14,296,888 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,393
of 10,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,165
of 315,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,296,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.