You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Equipoise, design bias, and randomized controlled trials: the elusive ethics of new drug development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, March 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/ar1170 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James F Fries, Eswar Krishnan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 28% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 42% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2,095
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,593
of 66,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.