↓ Skip to main content

Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI))

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI))
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001894.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah-Kate Carney, Sangeeta Das, Debbie Blake, Cindy Farquhar, Mourad M Seif, Linsey Nelson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 155 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 21%
Student > Bachelor 25 16%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 27 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#10,114,772
of 16,975,484 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,555
of 11,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,214
of 348,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,975,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.