You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparative study of catastrophic health expenditure in Zhejiang and Qinghai province, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-018-3658-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xuemei Zhen, Hao Zhang, Xiaoqian Hu, Shuyan Gu, Yuanyuan Li, Yuxuan Gu, Minzhuo Huang, Xueshan Sun, Jingming Wei, Hengjin Dong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 25% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,550,873
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,654
of 7,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,443
of 350,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#144
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.