↓ Skip to main content

Microbiota dysbiosis and barrier dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancers: exploring a common ground hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 726)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbiota dysbiosis and barrier dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancers: exploring a common ground hypothesis
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12929-018-0483-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Chia-Hui Yu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 31 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,244,547
of 14,692,337 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#26
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,628
of 313,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#4
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,692,337 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.