↓ Skip to main content

Sinonasal debridement versus no debridement for the postoperative care of patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sinonasal debridement versus no debridement for the postoperative care of patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011988.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Tzelnick, Uri Alkan, Moshe Leshno, Peter Hwang, Ethan Soudry

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 24 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,360,496
of 15,807,984 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,595
of 11,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,801
of 318,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,807,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.