| Title |
Reasons For Lack of Follow-up Colonoscopy Among Persons With A Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Result: A Qualitative Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Gastroenterology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41395-018-0381-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diego Llovet, Mardie Serenity, Lesley Gotlib Conn, Caroline A. Bravo, Bronwen R. McCurdy, Catherine Dubé, Nancy N. Baxter, Lawrence Paszat, Linda Rabeneck, Amanda Peters, Jill Tinmouth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 50% |
| Spain | 3 | 21% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,355,898
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#1,786
of 5,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,051
of 361,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#31
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.