↓ Skip to main content

Relevance of Reference Centers in Sarcoma Care and Quality Item Evaluation: Results from the Prospective Registry of the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcoma (GEIS)

Overview of attention for article published in Oncologist, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relevance of Reference Centers in Sarcoma Care and Quality Item Evaluation: Results from the Prospective Registry of the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcoma (GEIS)
Published in
Oncologist, November 2018
DOI 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Martin‐Broto, Nadia Hindi, Josefina Cruz, Javier Martinez‐Trufero, Claudia Valverde, Luis M. De Sande, Angeles Sala, Lorena Bellido, Ana De Juan, Jordi Rubió‐Casadevall, Roberto Diaz‐Beveridge, Ricardo Cubedo, Oscar Tendero, Diego Salinas, Isidro Gracia, Rafael Ramos, Silvia Baguè, Antonio Gutierrez, José Duran‐Moreno, Antonio Lopez‐Pousa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Librarian 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 3 30%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Psychology 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,750,890
of 14,083,883 outputs
Outputs from Oncologist
#375
of 2,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,533
of 311,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncologist
#11
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,083,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.