↓ Skip to main content

LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP): factors associated with ownership and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda: a cross-sectional survey of 48 districts

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP): factors associated with ownership and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets in Uganda: a cross-sectional survey of 48 districts
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12936-018-2571-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Gonahasa, Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Sheila Rugnao, Grant Dorsey, Jimmy Opigo, Adoke Yeka, Agaba Katureebe, Mary Kyohere, Amy Lynd, Janet Hemingway, Martin Donnelly, Moses R. Kamya, Sarah G. Staedke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,942,614
of 13,799,368 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,676
of 3,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,569
of 304,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#343
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,799,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.