↓ Skip to main content

Cancer as a dynamical phase transition

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 284)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer as a dynamical phase transition
Published in
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1742-4682-8-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul CW Davies, Lloyd Demetrius, Jack A Tuszynski

Abstract

This paper discusses the properties of cancer cells from a new perspective based on an analogy with phase transitions in physical systems. Similarities in terms of instabilities and attractor states are outlined and differences discussed. While physical phase transitions typically occur at or near thermodynamic equilibrium, a normal-to-cancer (NTC) transition is a dynamical non-equilibrium phenomenon, which depends on both metabolic energy supply and local physiological conditions. A number of implications for preventative and therapeutic strategies are outlined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 6%
Germany 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 131 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 22%
Physics and Astronomy 30 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Engineering 12 8%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 18 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,220,245
of 24,996,701 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#15
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,050
of 128,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,996,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.