You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to reduce children’s exposure to second-hand smoke in the home
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6140-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte Renwick, Qi Wu, Magdalena Opazo Breton, Rebecca Thorley, John Britton, Sarah Lewis, Elena Ratschen, Steve Parrott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 78% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 14% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,341,363
of 25,080,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,084
of 16,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,712
of 350,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#134
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,080,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.