↓ Skip to main content

Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012439.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke Wolfenden, Sharni Goldman, Fiona G Stacey, Alice Grady, Melanie Kingsland, Christopher M Williams, John Wiggers, Andrew Milat, Chris Rissel, Adrian Bauman, Margaret M Farrell, France Légaré, Ali Ben Charif, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Rebecca K Hodder, Jannah Jones, Debbie Booth, Benjamin Parmenter, Tim Regan, Sze Lin Yoong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 263 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 20%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 51 19%
Unknown 59 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 20%
Social Sciences 23 9%
Psychology 17 6%
Sports and Recreations 14 5%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 70 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#800,407
of 15,329,269 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,281
of 11,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,422
of 315,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,329,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.