↓ Skip to main content

Do Low‐Cost Seismographs Perform Well Enough for Your Network? An Overview of Laboratory Tests and Field Observations of the OSOP Raspberry Shake 4D

Overview of attention for article published in Seismological Research Letters, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Low‐Cost Seismographs Perform Well Enough for Your Network? An Overview of Laboratory Tests and Field Observations of the OSOP Raspberry Shake 4D
Published in
Seismological Research Letters, November 2018
DOI 10.1785/0220180251
Authors

Robert E. Anthony, Adam T. Ringler, David C. Wilson, Emily Wolin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 46 57%
Engineering 10 13%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 13 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2020.
All research outputs
#778,915
of 18,663,462 outputs
Outputs from Seismological Research Letters
#58
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,082
of 326,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seismological Research Letters
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,663,462 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.