↓ Skip to main content

Computational analysis reveals histotype-dependent molecular profile and actionable mutation effects across cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational analysis reveals histotype-dependent molecular profile and actionable mutation effects across cancers
Published in
Genome Medicine, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13073-018-0591-9
Authors

Daniel Heim, Grégoire Montavon, Peter Hufnagl, Klaus-Robert Müller, Frederick Klauschen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,432,009
of 13,994,718 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#879
of 981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,690
of 310,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#94
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,994,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.