You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (<i>Paradoxurus musangus</i>)
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2019
Ali Anwar AHMAD, Norsham Abd WAHAB, Clara Wenjing YEO, Serena Jocelyn Wai Yin OH, Hui Cheng CHEN
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Postgraduate||1||11%|
|Student > Master||1||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||3||33%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||11%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||11%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
of 3,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 438,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.