↓ Skip to main content

Mixed-chemical exposure and predicted effects potential in wadeable southeastern USA streams

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mixed-chemical exposure and predicted effects potential in wadeable southeastern USA streams
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul M. Bradley, Celeste A. Journey, Jason P. Berninger, Daniel T. Button, Jimmy M. Clark, Steve R. Corsi, Laura A. DeCicco, Kristina G. Hopkins, Bradley J. Huffman, Naomi Nakagaki, Julia E. Norman, Lisa H. Nowell, Sharon L. Qi, Peter C. VanMetre, Ian R. Waite

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Unspecified 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Unspecified 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 28 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,858,420
of 19,049,821 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#4,428
of 19,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,234
of 275,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#94
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,049,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.