You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of secukinumab versus other biologics and apremilast in the treatment of active Psoriatic arthritis: a Finnish perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-018-0162-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timo Purmonen, Kari Puolakka, Devarshi Bhattacharyya, Minal Jain, Janne Martikainen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 21% |
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 16% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 31% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,368,270
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#79
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,450
of 340,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.