↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of cervical cancer in HIV-seropositive women from developing countries through cervical cancer screening: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of cervical cancer in HIV-seropositive women from developing countries through cervical cancer screening: a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0874-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Witness Mapanga, Brendan Girdler-Brown, Shingairai A. Feresu, Tsungai Chipato, Elvira Singh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 264 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 53 20%
Student > Master 34 13%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 86 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 24%
Unspecified 53 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 99 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,306,167
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#757
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,056
of 453,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#30
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.