↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of cervical cancer in HIV-seropositive women from developing countries through cervical cancer screening: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of cervical cancer in HIV-seropositive women from developing countries through cervical cancer screening: a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0874-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Witness Mapanga, Brendan Girdler-Brown, Shingairai A. Feresu, Tsungai Chipato, Elvira Singh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 23 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 30 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,424,232
of 15,153,847 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#504
of 1,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,044
of 377,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#107
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,153,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.