↓ Skip to main content

The effect of rehabilitation interventions on physical function and immobility-related complications in severe stroke—protocol for a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of rehabilitation interventions on physical function and immobility-related complications in severe stroke—protocol for a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0870-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark P. McGlinchey, Jimmy James, Christopher McKevitt, Abdel Douiri, Sarah McLachlan, Catherine M. Sackley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 18%
Student > Master 18 10%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 80 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 38 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 14%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 82 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,314,085
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#630
of 2,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,153
of 438,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#26
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.